In the battle for customers, price perception is one of the most important factors for customers in choosing a store, right after location.¹ Retailers worldwide have responded with various pricing strategies to improve price perception and one of the less well-understood is the so-called Price Match Guarantee (PMG) with open questions such as ‘how should retailers measure PMG success?’ ‘How will customers respond?’ and ‘what are the levers to optimise a PMG?’
In this article we explore these questions in more detail, and look at how retailers could respond.
What is a Price Match Guarantee?
A PMG is essentially a promise by the retailer to refund the difference if the customer, post-purchase, finds a lower price elsewhere. PMGs have been used in both wholesale and consumer markets by major retailers worldwide, such as Walmart, Tesco, and Best Buy to name a few.
Typically, there are conditions to make the comparison fair and financially reasonable such as:
In July 2018 Tesco decided (and soon followed by Asda²) to scrap its PMG of three years to instead focus on an Every-Day-Low-Price strategy³. The PMG was only used by one in eight people and more people were preferring the straightforward value for money over “price match vs. Asda, Morrison’s or Sainsbury’s when you buy 10 or more products, to the maximum value of £20”.
In 2020, however, Tesco launched the Aldi Price Match⁴ which is a simpler PMG, focused on matching the prices on hundreds of Tesco and branded products against prices in Aldi. Tesco reported in their most recent 2020/2021 annual results to have the highest value perception in a decade of which Aldi Price Match is thought to have played a positive role⁵. Ultimately this shows that both the competitive landscape and the way the PMG is designed really matter.
Measuring success
If we start by understanding what value means to customers, we can work our way backwards and design product and services that deliver that in a way that is compatible with the business model. This is called value-based pricing as opposed to cost-based pricing. With this in mind, there are three KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) we recommend tracking:
If you don’t know how to measure price perception or who your loyal customers are, there are ways to scientifically get to this understanding through a Price Perception study or a Segmentation project. And if the answer to one of the three questions above is no, then it is worth considering whether the PMG is set up in a way that makes sense to the customers.
According to Daniel Kahneman (Thinking, Fast and Slow, 2013) our mind has a System 1 that is fast and without effort and a System 2 that is slow and requires effort. Naturally, we want to save energy so we are inclined to use our System 1 even though there are times when System 2 would be better, such as when calculating the sum of 24 x 117 in our heads. Prices and promotion can evoke both System 1 and System 2 thinking. A yellow price tag indicating a good deal and our System 1 will immediately urge an action to buy.
Other times, promo mechanics force us to activate our System 2 which in return impacts our price perception negatively. Exotic mechanics such as “Buy X of article A and Y articles from group B and get Z% off an article in group C” is a typical System 2 case. Even the more straightforward sounding “percentage off” can be hard to calculate for most people to bother.
Simply put, the more System 1 pricing we do, the more fluent and positive the experience is likely to be and the better for the price perception overall. In addition to simpler mechanics, ensuring logic at shelf through Bigger Pack Better Value, Good Better Best ladders and logical National Brand to Private Label link can help more fluent prices and thus improve pricing.
Understanding customers to optimise Price Match Guarantees
Once you know how to measure success, it is time to understand the likelihood of success. There are many relevant areas to assess such as the competitive landscape, the degree of identical products across competition, perceived level of fairness and the customer value map.⁶
With the latter area, customer understanding, we know value is important to customers and we know that the perception of value is inherently dependent upon how the customer perceives the product, the benefits it offers, and the alternatives. Due to the complexities of pricing, prices are largely processed subconsciously and therefore subject to many psychological influences.
To illustrate the complexity of price perception, imagine your local store. A traditional discounter will have ~5,000 SKUs (Stock Keeping Unit), while a supermarket or hypermarket can have anything from 10,000 to 100,000 SKUs. Most retailers change prices on a regular basis, some up to 10% of the assortment per week and on some key lines up to several times a day. With this many price changes, how are customers supposed to know what the actual prices are in the store?
To make this easier to address, we’ve broken the price perception down into seven levers using qualitative and quantitative research. With this framework it is possible to assess which drivers are most important and which role an existing PMG is playing.
Another way to approach optimisation of a PMG is to understand
Let’s shed some light on how to answer the above two questions.
Locals, Advanced and Price Sensitive Customers
A key criterion to effectuate the PMG is that there is a willingness and an ability to search for competitor prices. With an increasing share of products sold online, comparison engines such as Pricerunner or CamelCamelCamel have created increasing price transparency i.e., customers can search for prices. It’s important to consider however that willingness to use these websites to price match is likely to be correlated to purchase frequency and the price point of a particular product in question. Higher price points on less frequent purchases are going to be less of an “impulse” buy. If purchasing a durable good as oppose to a consumable there is increased likelihood of price comparison.
When it comes to the willingness, we can use search cost as a proxy. Search cost is a term from economics defined as the time, energy and money expended by a customer who is researching a product or service for purchase.⁷ Price sensitive customers can be defined as “those with high willingness to invest time and cost to save money”.⁸ Some customers will have high search costs, and some will have low depending on the urgency and price and product knowledge. When you are locked out of your apartment you care less about the price of a locksmith than urgently getting back inside. Customers with high price knowledge can be classified as a “Tourist.” They are less sensitive to price as they do not know the “Local” prices and may be in a different mindset than the “Locals”. From the product perspective we have the “Beginners” who are still learning about the hobby, so they have high search costs, low base level demand and inelastic price behaviour (not buying in bulk). Conversely, the “Advanced” know the hobby well and therefore, have low search costs and an elastic demand.⁹
By using data and segmentation it is possible to assess the likelihood of a PMG succeeding. More Locals, Advanced and Price Sensitive customers will increase the likelihood of PMGs being both noticed and appreciated. Furthermore, some categories might be more relevant for PMG than others.
Managing public blow back
Finally, an important element of pricing is fairness and there are few things that can threaten customers feeling of fairness more than price discrimination. The areas of contention are:
Price decrease or increase
The refund only applies to the customers who find a price difference while other customers effectively will be discriminated upon. This is what theoretical economists call the Price Discrimination Theory. This school argues that since not all customers will be equally price sensitive and/or willing to search for price differences, the firm has an incentive to win back lost margin with the price sensitive by raising prices for the non-price sensitive customers. This is further supported by the Implicit Collusion Theory which argues that with PMGs it becomes futile to lower prices as this would trigger a race to the bottom. However, in practise it can be observed during price wars and the summer period, where prices under price matching have been both increased and decreased.
On the other hand, scholars within the marketing literature have, through the Signalling Theory, found that a PMG effectively gives the power to the customers who can vote with their wallet to force ’high‘ cost retailers to either abandon PMG or lower prices.
Whether this leads to higher or lower prices for customers in aggregate is still debated among academics, practitioners and politicians but understanding the arguments for and against is the best way to face into discussions on PMGs in a fairness and/or political context.
False sense of security?
It is not a given that just because a retailer has a PMG that they also have the lowest prices. Anecdotal examples of promoted products not being available in store, or prices not actually being cheapest could make customers feel like they are being cheated. It has also been found that in some cases up to 86% of retailers that offered a PMG did not offer the lowest price.¹³ It is therefore essential to have a solid web scraping or monitoring system in place to be proactive and manage situations where customers feel the PMG gives them a false sense of security.
Recommendations for retailers
A PMG is one tool in the toolbox of retailers who are either discounters or hi-Lo. The overall measure of success should be to increase loyalty and price perception. To do this well we recommend the following:
To learn more about how Pricing and Promotions solutions could help your business, get in touch with your local dunnhumby representative.
¹ dunnhumby RPI reports, various, 2020-2021
² https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/7189960/asda-scrap-price-match-scheme/
³ https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/tesco-scrap-price-match-guarantee-12793947
⁴ https://www.tesco.com/groceries/en-GB/zone/aldi-price-match
⁵ https://www.tescoplc.com/media/757092/_tesco-plc-preliminary-results-2021.pdf
⁶ https://www.strategyzer.com/canvas/value-proposition-canvas
⁷ https://www.strategyzer.com/canvas/value-proposition-canvas
⁸ Pricing strategy: setting price levels, managing price discounts, & establishing price structures (Smith 2017)
⁹ https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/search-cost.asp
¹⁰ Pricing strategy: setting price levels, managing price discounts, & establishing price structures (Smith, 2017)
¹¹ Price-Matching Guarantees as a Direct Signal of Low Prices (Mamadehussene, 2009)
¹² “On the Use of Low-Price Guarantees to Discourage Price Cutting” by Arbatskaya, Hviid, and Shaffer (2006)
¹³ It might be that base prices have a bigger impact on price perception and that using data to identify the right KVIs for price-sensitive customers and invest in those rather than activating a PMG is a better strategy
Cookie | Description |
---|---|
cli_user_preference | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store the yes/no selection the consent given for cookie usage. It does not store any personal data. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category . |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Analytics" category . |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
CookieLawInfoConsent | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store the summary of the consent given for cookie usage. It does not store any personal data. |
viewed_cookie_policy | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
wsaffinity | Set by the dunnhumby website, that allows all subsequent traffic and requests from an initial client session to be passed to the same server in the pool. Session affinity is also referred to as session persistence, server affinity, server persistence, or server sticky. |
Cookie | Description |
---|---|
wordpress_test_cookie | WordPress cookie to read if cookies can be placed, and lasts for the session. |
wp_lang | This cookie is used to remember the language chosen by the user while browsing. |
Cookie | Description |
---|---|
CONSENT | YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data. |
vuid | Vimeo installs this cookie to collect tracking information by setting a unique ID to embed videos to the website. |
_ga | The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognise unique visitors. |
_gat_gtag_UA_* | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics to store the website's unique user ID. |
_ga_* | Set by Google Analytics to persist session state. |
_gid | Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. |
_hjSessionUser_{site_id} | This cookie is set by the provider Hotjar to store a unique user ID for session tracking and analytics purposes. |
_hjSession_{site_id} | This cookie is set by the provider Hotjar to store a unique session ID, enabling session recording and behavior analysis. |
_hp2_id_* | This cookie is set by the provider Hotjar to store a unique visitor identifier for tracking user behavior and session information. |
_hp2_props.* | This cookie is set by the provider Hotjar to store user properties and session information for behavior analysis and insights. |
_hp2_ses_props.* | This cookie is set by the provider Hotjar to store session-specific properties and data for tracking user behavior during a session. |
_lfa | This cookie is set by the provider Leadfeeder to identify the IP address of devices visiting the website, in order to retarget multiple users routing from the same IP address. |
Cookie | Description |
---|---|
aam_uuid | Set by LinkedIn, for ID sync for Adobe Audience Manager. |
AEC | Set by Google, ‘AEC’ cookies ensure that requests within a browsing session are made by the user, and not by other sites. These cookies prevent malicious sites from acting on behalf of a user without that user’s knowledge. |
AMCVS_14215E3D5995C57C0A495C55%40AdobeOrg | Set by LinkedIn, indicates the start of a session for Adobe Experience Cloud. |
AMCV_14215E3D5995C57C0A495C55%40AdobeOrg | Set by LinkedIn, Unique Identifier for Adobe Experience Cloud. |
AnalyticsSyncHistory | Set by LinkedIn, used to store information about the time a sync with the lms_analytics cookie took place for users in the Designated Countries (which LinkedIn determines as European Union (EU), European Economic Area (EEA), and Switzerland). |
bcookie | LinkedIn sets this cookie from LinkedIn share buttons and ad tags to recognise browser ID. |
bscookie | LinkedIn sets this cookie to store performed actions on the website. |
DV | Set by Google, used for the purpose of targeted advertising, to collect information about how visitors use our site. |
ELOQUA | This cookie is set by Eloqua Marketing Automation Tool. It contains a unique identifier to recognise returning visitors and track their visit data across multiple visits and multiple OpenText Websites. This data is logged in pseudonymised form, unless a visitor provides us with their personal data through creating a profile, such as when signing up for events or for downloading information that is not available to the public. |
gpv_pn | Set by LinkedIn, used to retain and fetch previous page visited in Adobe Analytics. |
lang | Session-based cookie, set by LinkedIn, used to set default locale/language. |
lidc | LinkedIn sets the lidc cookie to facilitate data center selection. |
lidc | Set by LinkedIn, used for routing from Share buttons and ad tags. |
li_gc | Set by LinkedIn to store consent of guests regarding the use of cookies for non-essential purposes. |
li_sugr | Set by LinkedIn, used to make a probabilistic match of a user's identity outside the Designated Countries (which LinkedIn determines as European Union (EU), European Economic Area (EEA), and Switzerland). |
lms_analytics | Set by LinkedIn to identify LinkedIn Members in the Designated Countries (which LinkedIn determines as European Union (EU), European Economic Area (EEA), and Switzerland) for analytics. |
NID | Set by Google, registers a unique ID that identifies a returning user’s device. The ID is used for targeted ads. |
OGP / OGPC | Set by Google, cookie enables the functionality of Google Maps. |
OTZ | Set by Google, used to support Google’s advertising services. This cookie is used by Google Analytics to provide an analysis of website visitors in aggregate. |
s_cc | Set by LinkedIn, used to determine if cookies are enabled for Adobe Analytics. |
s_ips | Set by LinkedIn, tracks percent of page viewed. |
s_plt | Set by LinkedIn, this cookie tracks the time that the previous page took to load. |
s_pltp | Set by LinkedIn, this cookie provides page name value (URL) for use by Adobe Analytics. |
s_ppv | Set by LinkedIn, used by Adobe Analytics to retain and fetch what percentage of a page was viewed. |
s_sq | Set by LinkedIn, used to store information about the previous link that was clicked on by the user by Adobe Analytics. |
s_tp | Set by LinkedIn, this cookie measures a visitor’s scroll activity to see how much of a page they view before moving on to another page. |
s_tslv | Set by LinkedIn, used to retain and fetch time since last visit in Adobe Analytics. |
test_cookie | Set by doubleclick.net (part of Google), the purpose of the cookie is to determine if the users' browser supports cookies. |
U | Set by LinkedIn, Browser Identifier for users outside the Designated Countries (which LinkedIn determines as European Union (EU), European Economic Area (EEA), and Switzerland). |
UserMatchHistory | LinkedIn sets this cookie for LinkedIn Ads ID syncing. |
UserMatchHistory | This cookie is used by LinkedIn Ads to help dunnhumby measure advertising performance. More information can be found in their cookie policy. |
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE | A cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface. |
YSC | YSC cookie is set by YouTube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on YouTube pages. |
yt-remote-connected-devices | YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. |
yt-remote-device-id | YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. |
yt.innertube::nextId | This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. |
yt.innertube::requests | This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. |
_gcl_au | Set by Google Analytics, to take information in advert clicks and store it in a 1st party cookie so that conversions can be attributed outside of the landing page. |